Blog

Value Traps

By Rohit Chauhan
In General thoughts, Notable value investors, Uncategorized
November 16, 2006
2 Min read
7 comments
V

I think every value investor dreads a value trap which is basically a company, which seems cheap by historical standards and the gap between the price and the supposed intrinsic value does not close.

I found the following very useful comment from bill miller (he is a very famous money manager in the US whose fund has beaten the index for a straight 15 years)

“You never know for certain, but the nature of value traps is, they tend to have certain characteristics. Typically, one is that the valuation of the business or the industry is lower than its historical norms. The company or business normally has a fairly long history, so the historical normal valuations provide a lot of comfort. Therefore, when you get down toward the lower end of these valuations, value people find them attractive. The trap comes in when there’s a secular change, where the fundamental economics of the business are changing or the industry is changing, and the market is slowly incorporating that into the stock price. So that would be the case over the last several years with newspapers. They are a good example of where historical valuation metrics aren’t working.”

The complete article is here

In addition found the following interesting quote from warren buffett

“Margin of Safety is the untapped pricing power in a business.”

Read on7 comments

Further thoughts on pricing strength of a business

By Rohit Chauhan
In Competitive advantage, Investing Philosophy, Uncategorized
November 13, 2006
2 Min read
3 comments
F

The following question was posed to me by Prem sagar on my previous post. The question made me think and I am posting my thoughts on what I think is a fairly important issue in investing (earlier post on pricing )

But what would u say for an industry like say auto ancillaries or retail-proxies like Bartronics, control print, etc where the opportunity is huge, but they have little or no pricing power?

According to me, pricing is an important variable to evaluate the presence of a competitive advantage or strength. A company with strong pricing power, will be able to sustain high returns for a long time and can increase its intrinsic value over time too. So if one were to buy a company with strong pricing power (with other factors in favour), then it is likely that the investment would work out well with passage of time as the company increases its intrinsic value. So such companies can be long term holdings in a portfolio

That said, it does not mean that companies without pricing power would not be good investments. If one can find a company with low pricing power (commodity business), but with some kind of competitive advantage and selling below its intrinsic value, then such a company can be good investment. I would however not hold such an investment too long, once the stock price is close to the intrinsic value as the likelyhood of an increase in the intrinsic value is less.

I do not have much insight into retail-proxies. However as far as auto-ancillaries are concerned, I have done a bit of analysis ( see here, and here) and have not found too many companies to invest in (mainly due to valuation issues). By the very nature of the industry, these companies have poor pricing power (except for retail), have a few large buyers (OEM) and not many have achieved economies of scale in their operation (this industry is still fairly fragmented). However some auto-ancillaries do posses a few competitive advantages such as a low cost position due to focus on specific segment (fasteners for sundaram clayton?) and good growth opportunities. However as I have written earlier, I would invest in these companies only at a fair discount to intrinsic value and sell once the stock reaches the intrinsic value. I would really not hold the stock for a long term.

Read on3 comments

Learnings from the Book: The warren buffett way

By Rohit Chauhan
In Book review, Uncategorized, Warren buffett
November 9, 2006
2 Min read
4 comments
L

I have been reading again the excellent Book ‘The warren buffett way’. This book was my first exposure to Warren buffett and his approach to Investing. I have followed and learnt from him since then. The following were the key re-learnings I have had over the past few days (I am yet to finish the book)

– ROE (Return on equity) is one the most important indicator of the economic performance of a company. A company can raise this measure through five different means
o Higher Asset turns (Sales / Total assets)
o Higher margins
o Higher leverage
o Cheaper leverage
o Lower taxes.

I have seen the above happen for several companies in the past few years and have seen the stock price follow the improvement in ROE

For ex: Bluestar (better asset turns), ICICI bank (cheaper leverage, higher margins).

– Inflation does not improve ROE and actually reduces the net return to an investor
– The best companies are the ones which have strong franchies like crisil. Over time some of them become weak franchises. Further weakning of the franchise leads to a good business and then finally to a commodity company.
– Pricing strength is a key attribute of Franchises. These companies can raise prices even when the demand is flat and can earn good returns.

Read on4 comments

Blue star india – A quick look

By Rohit Chauhan
In Company analysis, Investment ideas, Uncategorized
November 2, 2006
3 Min read
Add comment
B

Blue star india is primarily in the commercial air conditioning and refrigeration business. The three main business segments are

1.Central air conditioning: This is the main business for blue star. It accounts for 70 %+ of the company’s revenue, has been growing at 25 % and has a pre-tax ROCE of almost 60 %. Blue star is fairly dominant in this sector and has a good market share of almost 30%. This sector is dependent on industrial demand, IT/ITES sector and retail. Lately the industrial sector, IT/ITES and retail sector have been boyant due to which Blue star has a good backlog of orders.

2.Cooling products: This comprises of Window, split A/c and other retail products such as water coolers, cold storage etc. This is a fairly competitive segment with strong brands such as carrier aircon and other vendors. This segment had a good volume growth and revenue growth of 30%. However as this segment is competitive, the pre-tax ROCE is at a respectable 15%.

3.Professional electronics and industrial equipment: This segment had a good growth last year on a small base of 60 Crs. The segment is small accounting for less than 10% of the total revenue. The pre-tax ROCE is high at almost 70%+.

Key competitive strengths
Blue star has key advantages via a strong brand in its key segments. It has a good reputation in terms of project execution and after sales service for the institutional segment. There is certain amount of lockin once a customer (especially if it is an institutional one) has selected and installed a blue star system. Subsequent orders would likely be for the same vendor. Due to high market share, blue star has certain demand and production economies of scale, which allows it to be a low cost provider. The central air conditioning segment is project driven, where project skills, experience and scale matters as the margins are fairly low (pre-tax margins were < 10 %) and hence a company has to be efficient to be a profitable business.

Problems areas
The company has performed well on most parameters such as revenue growth, NPM, ROE etc. However for the last 1-2 years, the free cash flow of the company has been dropping. The current year’s FCF was around 40 % of the operating profits. The main culprits have been account recievables and inventory. The recievables ratio has dropped from 6 to 4.9 and the inventory ratio has dropped from 9 to 7.9. The drops are not alarming and are still good in an absolute sense. However they need to be watched closely to see if the growth is not coming a high price (write-offs of bad debts and inventory later)

Valuation
Assuming (a big assumption though), the company can manage its Working capital, the Net profit can be taken as Free cash flow. The last year EPS (post split) was 5.8. The current year EPS should come be conservatively at 7. Using a DCF (with various assumptions) I would value the company roughly at 140-160 Rs/ Share. My personal opinion is that the stock is fairly priced.

Disclosure : I have owned the stock for the past few years.

Read onAdd comment

Hidden Value : Kirloskar oil engines

By Rohit Chauhan
In Company analysis, Investment ideas, Uncategorized
October 29, 2006
3 Min read
Add comment
H

Analysis date: Aug 2006

Kirloskar oil engines, a company from the kirloskar group has two main business segments

Engines: This business segment accounts for almost 80 % of the revenue and is the main business segment. This business caters to the farm sector, power sector, industrial machinery, Construction and material handling equipment. In addition the company has contracts/ relationships with OEM manufacturers, the armed forces and has its own service dealers and service personnels. The company has products in a wide HP ranges and has technical collaborations too. The highest volume comes from the small engines segment followed by the medium engines.

Autocomponents: This business segment accounts for the balance 20% and had an above industry growth due to capacity constraints. In addition the company has OEM relationships with some prominent companies such as maruti, sundaram clayton etc. The main products are valves and bearings

Other business: Some other minor businesses such as manufacturing grey iron castings, trading, power generation and sales (which is under review due to dropping sales)

The Company has benefitted from the recent improvement in the capital goods sector and upturn in the power sector. The period from 1996 to 2001 such low growth (20% in almost 6-7 years). Due to the improvement in the business climate the topline and margins have improved dramatically in the recent past. The company is seeing good volume growth in its core business and has also delivered good performance in the export sector which crossed 100 Crs this year.

Due to the nature of the industry (capital goods) with limited and large buyers, and due to cyclical nature the topline and margins are also cyclical. The NPM has fluctuated between as low as 2-3 % to 15 % in the recent past. I would put the average NPM at 6-7 % over a complete business cycle.

The company has become fairly efficient with the Fixed asset turnover ratios expanding from 4-5 to 7-8 in the recent past. Wcap ratios have gone through a dramatic improvement and is now almost 14. This freeing up of the capital has raised the ROE from 8-10 % to almost 30% +. In addition on a total capital base of 795 Cr, almost 500 Crs is investments.

This 500 Crs of investment at market value is almost 1000cr which translates into almost 95 Rs/ share (net of debt)

Valuation: The last year Netprofit is almost Rs 10 / share (net of exceptional items). With almost 95 Rs / share of investment, I would value the stock at approximately 350 Rs / share (max). There are various assumptions behind this valuation, namely

1. Rs 18/ share for current year’s earnings are during a cyclical high. The average earnings are more like 14-16.

2. Rs 95/ share of investments is not really realisable as a major part of this investment is in other group/ JV’s, which are unlikely to be sold off soon.

3. The company has some competitive advantage such as customer relationships, some economies of scale etc. But in the end it is in a cyclical industry with moderate to weak pricing strength and hence I would not accord the core business a PE multiple of more than 16-18.

Read onAdd comment

A few investment ideas and analysis

By Rohit Chauhan
In Company analysis, Investment ideas, Uncategorized
October 25, 2006
3 Min read
3 comments
A

On running various filters in icicidirect, I was able to list a few companies which were worth further investigation.

My approach was to do a preliminary analysis and reduce the list further to a few more interesting opportunities.

I am listing the companies and my analysis. This analysis is a bit dated as I did this analysis during the aug/sept time frame and have not looked at the recent price for these companies

1. Merck : Indian subsidiary of the american MNC. The american parent has a 100% subsidiary too which could be getting all the new products from the parents portfolio (and I guess special treatment over the listed subsidiary).

The company is selling at approximately 5 times earnings after adjusting non operating income and cash on books. The company has a high ROE of 30 % and low growth of 4-5%. The actual ROE on tangible equity is 60% +.

The company has a Pharmaceuticals and chemicals business. It has recently sold its life sciences business and has approximately 3370 million on its books (Rs 200/ share).

The topline is expected to drop due to the sale of the life sciences business. The pharma business has a growth in single digits and the next years earnings could be 10-15 % over the earnings of 2005 (current year earnings are not comparable due to the sale of life sciences division)

This company is a value play. The management does not seem to be very shareholder friendly. It remains to be seen, what the management will do with the huge cash it has on its books . Will it try to buy out the indian shareholders at an unfair price like a few other MNC’s have done in past? Can happen.

I would estimate the intrinsic value conservatively at 700-800 Rs per share. However it is quite likely that the valuation gap may take a long time to close due to poor growth prospects and a management which may be indifferent to minority shareholders

2. Swaraj engines
The company showed up in my list as the PE seems to be 4-5. However after adjusting for the bonus issue, the actual PE is 14. Also the company has low growth, high debtors position and is mainly supplying to sister companies. It is a small cap company too. I do not see much value in this stock and decided to give it a pass.

The other stocks which I will detail in subsequent posts are

Grindwell norton
Revathi CP
Kirloskar oil engines
Hindustan inks
Tube investments
Neyvelli lignite
Gujarat gas

Please do not take the above list as a recommendation. This above post is just for analysis and I may or may not have invested in any of the above stocks

Read on3 comments

A break in the posting

By Rohit Chauhan
In Uncategorized
October 16, 2006
1 Min read
1 comment
A

Those of you who have visited this blog in the past , would have noticed a sudden drop in my posting.
I had consciously taken a break from posting on my blog. The break was mainly due to personal reasons and also because i felt, it was taking away too much of my spare time and distracting me from pursuing my interest in investing.
I have decided to resume my posts, although at a lower rate (may be once a week or more).

During the period from may to Oct (during my break), the market has swung from a crash to a new high of almost 13000. During that period, i was more or less inactive in terms of buying or selling. I ran a few screens and was able to find at best two decent ideas namely Kirloskar oil engines and Merck. More on these two ideas in subsequent posts.

Lastly thanks to Deepak Shenoy , for helping me fix my blog ( my line breaks had gone awry ).

Read on1 comment

New ideas

By Rohit Chauhan
In Investment ideas, Uncategorized
July 25, 2006
1 Min read
2 comments
N

Have been away for a while and not posted for quite sometime.
However i have been doing some research for new opportunities and have been finding some good ideas.

Two companies which i am analysing further are
– Kirloskar oil engines limited
– Merck limited

Will update my analysis of these two stocks on the blog once i am done. They are fairly underpriced and look good on a quantitative basis. However i need to analyse in more depth and come to a firm conclusion

Read on2 comments

Analysing the assumptions

By Rohit Chauhan
In Investment process, Uncategorized
May 3, 2006
3 Min read
9 comments
A
One approach to analysing stocks, bonds or even real estate is to look at the valuations and figure out the assumptions built into the price. It helps to analyse these assumptions and check if you buy into them. It also helps if one has a good sense of history and asset values in the past.
Let me take the example of the top tier IT companies like infosys, Wipro etc. These companies sell at a PE of 30+. So in effect the market seems to be ‘assuming’ the following
a) return on capital of 40%+ for the next 10 years
b) A compounded growth of 18%+ for the next 10 years
c) Maintenance of margins in the 20%+ range

Now it may be possible that these companies would achieve some of these expectations. But to justify their valuations they have to achieve all of them. Ofcourse the top tier IT companies are atleast doing fairly well and may even deserve a high valuation. One can find a number of mid-cap and small cap companies which are riskier, but valued at even higher valuations. The current earnings growth is being projected for quite a few of these companies well into the future. The same is being done for commodity companies like cement, steel too.
Lets take another example outside the stock market. Lets look at the current investment favourite ‘real estate’. Now if you believe like me that the value of any asset is the sum of all cash flows to eternity, an apartment selling at 60 lacs for an area of 2000 sqft would have the following assumption (3000 rs / sqft is not a very high rate these days)

a) 6% rental yields on the capital invesment of 60 lacs.
b) Growth in the yield (read rentals) at around 8-9% per annum
c) Terminal sale of the property after 30 years with a 9% appreciation per annum, with a discount of 10% for the older property.
What all of the above means is that
a) rental of Rs 30000 per month
b) A hike in the rental of around 8-9% per annum
c) The property will sell for 7.2 crs after 30 years (net present value is 95 lacs with an inflation of 7% per annum)

So for an apartment to justify a return of 8-9% total return at the current prices, the above should hold true. Whether it does or not, depends on ones view of the above ‘expectations’ in terms of rentals
Read on9 comments

‘I don’t know’

By Rohit Chauhan
In Investing Philosophy, Uncategorized
April 25, 2006
3 Min read
1 comment
‘

Ask any analyst, market commentator, investor or your friend on the future direction of the market and they will have a wide variety of views ranging from totally pessimistic to wildly optmisitic. Most will also have very plausible reasons to back up their viewpoints.

In reality, I doubt anyone can consistently time the market (and there is enough evidence to back it up). True some people can get it right sometimes, but I personally have never tried it as I know for sure that I will not get it right.

My approach to this question is ‘I don’t know’. I am not sure what will happen in the future. However that does not mean being blind to the present situation and doing nothing about. On the contrary I have some crude approaches to resolving this problem.

For individual stocks I typically maintain a valuation band (and not a price band). For example, if I think a business has very strong competitive advantage and will do very well, I tend to accord it higher valuations. As a specific case I can cite marico. Marico as a business was valued at a PE of around 10-12 in 2003, when I looked at it for the first time. I conservatively valued it at 20-22 at that time. Since then marico has done very well and may have improved its competitive position. As a result I have bumped up my valuation band to 25-27. The advantage I see in this approach is that I do not fixate on the price. Price is a function of the current earnings and the PE ratio, which in turn would depend on a variety of condition. By looking at a valuation band, I can assess the company’s competitive position and decide whether the current price looks overvalued or not.

Ofcourse the above approach is not perfect. A better approach would be to do a complete DCF analysis from scratch without any assumptions. However it is very time consuming and may not be feasible for me every time.

For the broader market, I have an even cruder method. I track the earnings growth, dividend yield and ROE of the market as a whole. I tend to treat a market PE of 20 as trigger to start investigating as to why the market should not be considered to be overvalued. A PE of 20 does not necessarily indicate an overvalued market. This number has to be seen in context of the other numbers I spoke of earlier. But at this point, I start analysing further and also look at reducing my holdings.

All of the above is hardly scientific and may appear as very crude. However I try not to be too smart in selling. I try to follow buffett’s advice (paraphrased) ‘Buy at such an attractive price, that selling becomes an easy decision’

In the end, my approach is to accept that I don’t know the future of the market and need to manage my emotions (greed at present!!). So a mechanical approach although sub-optimal works well for me.

As an aside, Mr market is current in complete euphoria with the kind of oversubscription for RPL and sun TV IPOs.

Great time for businesses to raise capital from the market !!

Read on1 comment

Subscription

Enter your email address if you would like to be notified when a new post is posted:

I agree to be emailed to confirm my subscription to this list

Recent Posts

Select category to filter posts

Archives