Blog

Negative review – Way of the Turtle

N

I received the following comment from senthil. He pointed out to a negative review on the book (see link in the comment) – Way of the turtle on which I have been posting for the past few days.

I found some review comments to be valid. However at the same time the reviewer has choosen to highlight only the negatives and not comment on the positives of the book. I think most of the books have a mix of both. I would say good books are the ones where the positives outwiegh the negatives. Ofcourse there are books which take a germ of an idea and use 250 pages to beat it to death. On the other hand there are very few books or classics which are worth reading multiple times. ‘Security analysis’ and ‘The intelligent investor’ by Benjamin graham, Common stock and uncommon profits by Phil fisher are a few which come to my mind.

The book (inspite of the title) is not a ‘how to’ book for trading. If, like me, you do not know much about trading, this book will at best give you a basic feel of what trading is all about. I have had a mental block against trading. The block was more on the lines that it is impossible to make money via trading. I am more inclined now to believe otherwise. I am more open to the idea that traders can and do make money. Does that mean that I am interested in trading? No .. I am not. I find long term buy and hold and other forms of value investing more appealing and easier to make money. I do not have the stomach to bear a drop of 40% in my portfolio.

I am planning to read a good book on real estate investing sometime next year to see what it is all about. Better to understand various forms of investing and then reject the ones which do not fit with my temprament than to have a closed mind against it.

Other books I am reading (not related to investing)

The four hour workweek – Interesting book and quite a few good ideas by the author, but goes overboard a lot of times.
Einstein: His Life and Universe – I seen a lot of good reviews on the book and wanted to read about Einstein. Also I think charlie munger has recommended this book (not sure though)

Book notes – Way of the Turtle – IV

B

My notes on the previous chapters of the book here, here and here.

The ninth chapter discusses about the building blocks of trading such as breakouts, moving averages, volatility channels, time based exits and simple look backs in detail. The next chapter follows with a detailed discussion on various systems such as the ATR channel breakout, Bollinger breakout and Donchian trend etc. This chapter also gives the performance data for all these systems based on the historical data. For ex: donchian trend has a 10 year return of 30% p.a with a max drawdown of 38.7%.

The important point in this chapter is the author’s emphasis on backtesting. Backtesting means that every system should be evaluated with respect historical data for returns and maximum drawdown. Backtesting may not help predict the future or ensure that the system will always work, but it would help to determine which system could be profitable in the future and what conditions are needed for the success of the system.

My comment: The same approach should be applied by investors too. For ex: value investing has almost a 50 year history of performance over varying periods and business conditions. So this approach to investing has proven its ‘fitness’ over a long period of time and in varying conditions. I would say that any other approach such as momentum investing should also be evaluated in a similar manner.

The next chapter discusses in detail the pitfalls of backtesting. The key reasons why the historical test results differ from actual trading are as follows
– trader effects : As more traders use the system, the effectiveness of the system is lost
– Random effects
– Overoptimization paradox:
– Curve fitting: Fitting the system to data

The chapter then discusses how these distortions can be resolved and backtesting results improved.

The next chapter discusses how one can get better results from backtesting. One approach is by using better measures such as RAR (regressed annual return), R-cubed and a robust sharpe ratio. In addition a representative sample and appropriate sample size can help to get better results. The author also discusses about monte-carlo simulations to analyse the various systems based on historical data.

Book notes – Way of the Turtle – III

B

The sixth chapter discussed various trading concepts such as support and resistance. These concepts are discussed in detail in this chapter with examples.

The seventh chapter is crucial to help answer the question: How can you know if a system or a manager is a good one. I would suggest reading this chapter in detail and understanding it and applying it when selecting or evaluating a trading system. A lot of trading systems refer only to the returns and choose to ignore risk. The chapter refers to four types of risk.

Drawdown – String of losses than can reduce capital in the trading account. It is the maximum loss the trader / manager or trading strategy incurred at any point of time.

Low returns – period of small gain where the trader cannot make enough money to make a living

Price shock – sudden price change which can wipe out a trader

System death – Change in market dynamics that causes a previously profitable system to start losing money.

The chapter discusses each type of risk in detail with examples for various trading systems. I was amazed with level of volatility which a lot the trading systems show. For example the author refers to trading systems which can generate returns of almost 35%+, but incur drawdowns of 40-45%. So there would be times when your capital would drop by 40%.

How many of us have the nerve to withstand this kind of losses?. So the next time around if some one recommends a trading strategy with high returns,ask about the drawdown. If the other guy cannot tell you the drawdown of his strategy, run (he does not know about trading or is trying to fool you). If he does give you a number, try to figure if you can tolerate that level of risk. The book also indicates that the higher the level of return, higher is the volatility and higher the drawdown. So if one is a beginner, try for a system which has a lower return and lower drawdown.

The next chapter revisits risk and money management again. The author again cautions the reader from underestimating risk and blindly accepting the claims of vendors or money managers. Curtis’s advise is to go for returns at which the risk is manageable and let compounding do its magic. No point in trying for 100% to 200% returns and then blowing up (losing all the money).

The author makes a very important point in this chapter. He says that trading is simple, but not easy. He gives the example of people like dentist or doctors who are smart and under the assumption that if they are smart and successful in their profession then they should be good at trading too. The reality is that these folks are not good traders.

I find this comment interesting. I have seen this all around me. A lot of people I meet are smart and very good at their jobs. They automatically assume that they will be good at investing. Intelligence may be a necessary but not a sufficient ingredient for success at investing. It is surprising that most professionals think that they can put 1-2 hours a week into investing and be a great investor. By that analogy, all of us should be good doctors and architects too. Anyone can be a good or great investor, but like most other pursuits in life, one has to work at it.

Coming back, the author also says that most new traders underestimate the pain of a drawdown. They believe that they can live through a 50-60% drawdown, but when it hits them, they may stop trading completely or change methods at the worst possible time. I have faced a drop of almost 25% early in my life as an investor and even that was painful. When you are starting off and face this kind of drop, it is easy to question the process.

Posts on previous chapters here and here

Book notes – Way of the Turtle – II

B

I have been reading the book – Way of the turtle for the past few days and have found it to be a good book. It is a book on trading. I posted my notes on the first two chapters earlier.

Notes on 3rd, 4th and 5th chapters follow –

The third chapter refers to the risk of ruin. This is risk a trader faces that several of his trades will go against him and he could lose his entire capital. The way to manage this risk is via Money management. This involves putting the position in small chunks called as units which are sized based on the type of the market, volatility measure of the market etc (please refer to the book for more details).

The third chapter refers to four key points

– Trade with an edge: Find a trading strategy which can produce positive returns over the long run as it has a positive expectation (see an earlier post on edge, kelly’s formulae etc here)
– Manage risk: Control risk via money management discussed earlier
– Be consistent: execute plan consistently to achieve the positive expectation of the system.
– Keep it simple

All the above points are equally valid for an investor as it is for a trader.

The fourth chapter focuses on thinking in the present and aviod thinking of the future. Successful traders do not attempt predict the future. They do not care about being right, only about making money. A key point is that good traders are also wrong a lot of times. However they do not beat themselves over it. They are focussed on sticking to a plan and trading well and not worrying about the success of each trade or do not look at each trade as a validation of their intelligence.

One of the biases namely recency baises can impact a trader severely, especially if he is on a losing streak. People have a tendency to overwiegh recent data. Recency bias results in a trader over wieghing recent performance, especially bad performance and the trader may end up abondoning a successful system. The way to avoid this bais is to focus on probabilities and to know that every system has a certain odd of failure (A certain number of trades will go wrong). However by focussing on the process than the outcome and being confident that the system works well in the long run, one can remain rational and continue with a successful system.

The fifth chapter discusses about the concept of edge in more detail. The chapter introduces various concepts such as MAE (maximum adverse excursion – loss over the time frame) and MFE (maximum favourable execursion – gain over a time frame). The E-ratio (edge) is ratio of MFE/MAE adjusted for volatility. This ratio can calculated for various duration such as 10 days, 50 days etc.

To find an edge, you need to locate entry points and exit points where there is greater than normal probability that the market will move in particular direction within the desired time frame. The various components that make an edge for a system comprises

– portfolio selection : alogrithms which markets are valid for trading on any specific day
– Entry signals : alogrithms that determine when to buy or sell to enter a trade
– Exit signal : alogrithms that determine when to buy or sell to exit a trade

Book notes – Way of the Turtle – I

B

I referred in my previous post about a book on trading – Way of the turtle which I have been reading for the past few days. Now why should a guy who displays a mental block against trading, read a book on the topic? The short answer is to challenge my own biases against trading.

I can definitely say that this is a good book and anyone wanting to learn about trading or wanting to evaluate a trading system (in a book or being sold by someone) should read this book. What follows over this and the next few posts is my own summary (not review) of the book with my own thoughts and comments (which I cannot resist putting 🙂 )

The book is written by curtis faith who was one of the turtles (traders) recruited by richard dennis and william eckhardt as a part of an experiment that trading can be taught. The author was one of the original recruits (and probably one of the most successful) who made more than 30 million for Richard.

The book describes the difference between an investor and a trader. An investor buys stocks, but is really buying an underlying business. A trader in contrast is concerned only about price and is essentially buying and selling risk. The second chapter of the books talks of the turtle mind, which I think is equally relevant for an investor.

As we all know that markets are populated by individuals who are driven by fear, greed and all other cognitive biases, which create opportunities for a trader. The book refers to various biases such as loss aversion – higher preference to avoid losses over gains, sunk cost effects – tendency to treat money that has already been committed as more valuable than money to be spent in the future, disposition effect – tendency to lock in gains and ride losses, outcome bias – tendency to judge a decision by the outcome than by the quality of the decision at the time it was made and several other biases such as recency biases, anchoring etc.

The second chapter describes each of these biases in detail and how it affects a trader. The chapter continues with various trading styles such as trend following, counter-trend trading, swing trading and day trading.

One the key points I realised from the initial chapter was that each of these trading styles are valid for specific types of market. Curtis refers to various markets such as stable and quiet, stable and volatile, trending and quiet and trending and volatile. For example, trend followers love markets that are trending and quiet where they can make more money than a volatile market which is more punishing to trend followers. In contrast counter-trend traders love markets that are stable and volatile.

Another key learning for me in the chapter – successful traders never try to predict the market direction. Instead they look for indications that a market is in a particular state and trade accordingly.

I will be posting the rest of my notes over the next few posts. You can find the author’s blog here.

Assumptions and beliefs

A

I read somewhere that all of us have a set of underlying assumptions based on which we create a model of the world. This model involves all aspects of life, but I will restrict myself of investing.

I am aware of a few assumptions on which my investing style or philosophy is based. These assumptions are not universal truths or applicable to others. Its just that I have developed these assumptions over a period of time. Some may be valid and some not. I constantly test these assumptions against my performance and try to discard those that work against my long term performance.

So here goes my list

1. Value investing is an extremely productive approach to investing for my circumstance. I have a regular job, a family and can devote only a limited time to investing. So for me value investing and an as an extension, buy and hold makes sense.
2. Trading is time consuming, too stressful and not a game in which I can or want to excel. In addition, I have a mental block against trading (which must quite obvious). I am currently reading a great book on trading – Way of the turtle (on which I will post next) to learn more about it. My initial reaction – Trading is not for the faint hearted, is a tougher (especially emotionally) way to make money and definitely not a part time activity.
3. Investment advice especially from analysts and financial website is baised and not worth following. Blogs are a different matter as the bloggers do not have a hidden agenda.
4. It is impossible to predict the markets in the short run. Don’t waste energy on that. Time is better spent in learning other aspects of investing
5. One can get better at investing if one is ready to put the effort into it.
6. Avoid options, derivatives and other avenues such as gold as there are enough opportunities in equities. No point in spreading my self thin. Knowing a little bit of equity, a little bit of commodities and gold will not get me superior returns. Focus on one area and do well in that.
7. Avoid stocks with high PE unless I am very very certain of the business prospects. Avoid stocks above a PE of 20 in most of the circumstances.
8. Avoid IPOs (see my logic here)
9. Investing in not an intrinsic talent usually. There are a few exceptions to it like warren buffett. I can learn to be a better investor.

I am a buy and hold investor. This has been gospel for me in the past. I guess if you follow warren buffett as much as I do, you end up following his philosophy completely. However over the past 1 year I am trying to expand beyond this approach. I would still prefer to buy and hold stocks for which the instrinsic value is increasing rapidly. However I have started looking seriously at a few more approaches such graham type deep value investing, special situations and also looking at how momentum may be combined with value investing . My core philosophy is still value investing, however I am trying to expand the scope.

Ashok Leyland

A

About
Ashok leyland is a 7500 Cr company in the automobile industry. It is the no.2 manufacturer of commercial vehicles in india. It has a 28% market share in commerical vehicle and is no.1 in the bus segment. It has a current capacity of around 80000 vehicles which would be expanded to 100000 vehicles in the next 1-2 years. The company has 6 plants at Ennore, hosur, Alwar and Bhandar and is putting a new plant in Uttaranchal.
The company has the following product segment – Buses, trucks, defence, spares, services and now the company is entering into design and other OEM services.

Financials
The company has doing well inline with the commerical vehicle industry. The turnaround in the sector performance has happened from 2002 and the industry has seen good growth since then. ALL (ashok leyland Ltd) has seen its revenue increase by 23% per annum since then and profits increase by 25%+. The company has become more efficient as its return on capital has increased from 15% to 25%+. The net margins have gone up from 3.8% to 5.2% during this period. The increase in ROC has come from better utilization of assets which have increased from 1.9 turns to 3.6 turns.
The company has used the free cash flows to reduce debt from a ratio of 0.75 in 2003 to 0.36 currently. Net of cash and cash equivalents the company is a zero debt company.

Positives
The financials of the company has improved a lot during the last 5 years. The company has used the upcycle to improve the balance sheet and make a few strategic acquisitions.

The company has acquired the truck Business of Avia in Europe and would be selling around 1000 trucks per annum (not sure of the exact number). In addition the company has agreed to purchase DTE in the US which provides testing services to OE manufacturers in the US. The company also has a JV with in UAE to build bus bodies in the UAE. The above acquisitions and other service initiatives should add value to the company and reduce the cyclical nature of the business.

In addition the company has been a good allocator of capital in the last 5 years and has a resonable dividend payout of almost 50%.The current management team seems to be more aggressive and focussed on doing well. The company has managed to increase its market share in the last 2-3 years too.

Risks
The business is cylical and during the down cycle there is considerable margin pressure. In addition the company has turnaround its performance during the last 5 years of boyant demand. However it still remains to be seen how the company will do during the down cycle.
Competition in the Commercial vehicle segment is now increasing due to the entry of foreign players and this could increase the pressure on the margins, especially during a down cycle.
The management is currently expanding capacity. However a drop in overall demand could depress profits in the short to medium term due to this excess capacity. However this risk is on the lower side and could be mitigated by increasing exports.

Valuation
The company sells at a PE of 12. The current EPS is around 3.3 per share. The company can be expected to grow at 10-12% over the next few years. In addition the company has some competitive advantage such as a known brand name (especially in the south), long operating history and experience in the market, rational management and a decent distrubution/ service network.
The company can be valued at around 16-18 times PE and given an intrinsic value of around 60 Rs/ share.

Conclusion
The company seems to be undervalued, but it is still not a screaming buy. A 10% drop in stock price could make it a good buy. In addition the company is selling close to its 52 week lows due to the slowdown in the CV sector. A further drop in the share price could present an attractive opportunity.

My Brief Notes on the Auto industry

M

The Auto industry consists of the following products segment and key companies

4 Wheelers (cars, UV etc) – Maruti, Hyundai, Tata motors, Ford etc. This is a fast growing sector of the market with the most action. Rising incomes and easier credit has resulted in growth in the industry. India is also developing into a Hub for exports especially for small and compact cars. This sub-sector is characterised by high competition and aggressive marketing. The key player is maruti with around 51% market share. The last 3-4 years have seen growths in excess of 15-20%. In addition competition is increasing in this segment with aggressive growth plans from Maruti, Tata motors and other foreign majors such as Toyota, GM, Hyundai etc. I have been looking at some of the companies in this sector and there are some good ideas. I will be posting on a few later.

2 wheelers (scooters, Bikes etc) – This has been a growth sector for the last decade. The annual volume is almost 8 Mn units making india one of the largest markets in the world. Bikes account for the majority (around 70 %??) of the demand with the rest taken by scooters and mopeds. The bike segment consists of the entry level bikes which are price sensitive, the mid-segment called the deluxe segment which is dominated by hero honda’s splendour and the top segment. The top segment has high growth currently, lower pricing pressure and shared between bajaj auto and hero honda. This sector has seen slowing down of growth recently and pressure on margins due to increase in raw material costs and increased competition.

Commercial vehicles ( LCV, MCV and HCV) – This sector is dominated by tata motors followed by Ashok leyland. The LCV and HCV sectors are seeing good growth due to development of infrastructure and the transportation model moving towards hub and spoke. The less than 16 ton segment is however seeing its share of the pie shrink. Competition is expected to increase due to foreign players such as Iveco and others. The latest quarter has been weak for the commerical vehicles sector. . The commerical vehicle industry is quite cyclical in nature and the companies in that sector are making an effort to reduce the impact by increasing the service, spares and export component of the business. The two companies in this sector Tata motors and ALL seem to be fairly priced. I will be posting on Ashok leyland soon.

Basic financials of the industry
The industry is characterised by economies of scale. The net margins are low (4-5%) and not likely to increase much due to competition and raw material pressures. The industry has a ROC of 20%+ and moderate compeititive advantages due to Entry barriers from scale, brands and first mover advantage. Rivalrly is not intense as yet, however competition is likely to increase when demand slows and foreign competition intensifies.

A more detailed Analysis of auto industry is updated in the worksheet (Business analysis_working_aug 2007) under ‘AUTO AND ANCILLARIES’

The Subprime mess and opportunity

T

Only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked – warren buffett

It is diffcult to avoid reading on the subprime mess in the US. I have an oversimplified explaination –
‘Losses being incurred by individual and institutions for overpaying for financial assets like CDO, MBS (mortage backed security) and other debt due to greed (for higher yields), ignorance (not knowing what was behind these assets) and overconfidence (too much faith on models)’. So what we are seeing is repricing (or correct pricing ?) of these assets.

Well for a much better understanding on what is happening and what may happen in the months to follow , read this article on fortune.

In a nutshell the opinion is that this bubble will take some time to unwind, there could be volatility in the markets due to that and there could be steep losses for some.

I think india is not going to be affected much directly. However we could see second order effects. With a liquidity crunch, it is quite possible that the excess liquidity which is driving our stock and real estate markets may dry up. This could cause some volatility and short term drops. How much and when ? …who knows. I think the equity markets are already reacting and there maybe be some anecdotal evidence of the same happening in the real estate market too.

If, like me, you have also been tracking some stocks or have surplus cash to invest , the next few months may provide a few good opportunities. For ex: the auto sector, oil and gas and several mid-cap, microcaps are now selling at much lower prices and could soon be great bragains.

The most common cause of low prices is pessimism. We want to do business in such an environment, not because we like pessimism, but because we like the prices it produces. It’s optimism that is the enemy of the rational buyer – warren buffett

Passive v/s Active investing

P

There is an interesting post by prem sagar on passive v/s active interesting. In response to the post deepak has posted a response on his blog

If I have understand it correctly, prem’s position is that one should calculate the delta returns one would get by investing actively and compare it with other sources of income such as a job and decide if it is worth the effort. For ex: an extra 3-4 % return on a portfolio of 10 lacs could mean 30-40 K extra money. Not enough to make active investing worth your while.

In contrast deepak’s position is that if the returns are around 50% then the delta would be 3-4 lacs (for a 10 lac portfolio). With these kind of returns, active investing can be looked at seriously.

I have thought long and hard on this above issue. My take is as follows

I think prem’s position is perfectly valid for a new investor. I really doubt if it is possible to earn 50% annual returns for a long period of time (atleast 5 years or more) by spending 1-2 hours per day on the side. However if you are one of those guys (I am definitely not) who has earned 50% per annum (from 2001-2006, which covers a bear and bull market) then you are an exceptional investor. If I were you, I would seriously look at investing as a career. I would get my returns audited (no one is going to believe unaudited claims) and then look at the publicizing the returns. For a person capable of earnings such returns, attracting capital would not be diffcult. One can start an investment partnership and become really rich.

However I am definitely not such a guy. My final objective is to reach that level referred to by deepak. So what I do in the interimn?

This is my thought process (which mirrors prem’s approach partly)

a. save money and increase the amount of investible capital
b. learn and improve my skills to improve my returns
c. When the investible capital becomes high and my returns (for atleast 5 years rolling) cross a threshold, it maybe time to look at investing as profession (assuming you love to do this, I do)
For ex: passive investing returns are 15% (long term index returns). Active investing returns are say 30%.Investible capital is say 100 lacs. Then a net extra return of 15 lacs may be worth the effort.

BTW, to give you an idea of what 30% long term returns mean, consider the following – superinvestor ‘warren buffett’ has made 26% per annum for last 50 years, george soros has made 30-35% per annum (may be a bit more) for around 30 years and rakesh jhunjunwala around 70% (assuming he started with 5000 rs and has 4000 crs or 1 bn dollars now). So if you can make 30%+ for more than 10 years, you are an exceptional investor and can really do well.

For lesser mortals (it is easy to think that you are exceptional based on 1-2 years returns, I did that myself in 1999-2000), I think prem sagar’s approach is a valid one to start with, learn as you go along and deepak’s is the one to aspire for.

As an aside, I completely agree with deepak’s concept of leverage which is also referred to by several other authors.

Subscription

Enter your email address if you would like to be notified when a new post is posted:

I agree to be emailed to confirm my subscription to this list

Recent Posts

Select category to filter posts

Archives